Argue why cancel culture is negative and a toxic approach coming to a consensus. Please use real life examples of why cancel culture doesn’t create beneficial or solution leading discourse.

Here is the outline:

English 111: Sample Argumentative Outline

Title:

A dismissive plague

P1:

(Grabber)

Has the commencement of cancel culture evinced as healthy and or constructive?

(Claim)

Cancel culture broadcasts ineffective activism with bias vendettas who patronize and chastise those in positions of authority.

P2 & 3:

T.S.

Addressing and conversing on these divisive issues is a step in the right direction.

P4:

T.S.

Cancel culture incites violence and consequential threats.

P5:

T.S.

Cancel culture isn’t productive and doesn’t work towards progressive change.

P6:

T.S.

Information is one sided and certain claims are mere conjecture. 

P7&8: 

T.S

Creates division rather than bringing attention to the issue.

P9

T.S.

Cancel culture licenses the disenfranchised to call out public figures and seek accountability for their actions.

P10

Last line

Let’s converse rather than condemn.